<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mirror of Justice &#187; Polygamy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mirrorofjustice.com/law-tag/polygamy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mirrorofjustice.com</link>
	<description>All about Law and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 23:09:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Texas Family Law</title>
		<link>http://www.mirrorofjustice.com/texas-family-law.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.mirrorofjustice.com/texas-family-law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 08:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Law Article</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flds]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Foster Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Polygamy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Presumed Innocence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sexual Abuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yearning For Zion Ranch]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mirrorofjustice.com/texas-family-law.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve heard some real horror stories about Houston&#8217;s infamous family law court so I am not surprised that a state appeals court Thursday said authorities had no right to seize more than 440 children in a raid on the splinter group&#8217;s compound last month. Unfortunately Texas family law courts seem to think they own the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard some real horror stories about Houston&#8217;s infamous family law court so I am not surprised that a state appeals court Thursday said authorities had no right to seize more than 440 children in a raid on the splinter group&#8217;s compound last month. Unfortunately Texas family law courts seem to think they own the children. </p>
<p>The Third Court of Appeals in Austin said the state failed to show the youngsters were in any immediate danger, the only grounds in Texas law for taking children from their parents without court action.</p>
<p>It was not clear when the children — now scattered in foster homes across the state — might be returned to their parents. The ruling gave a lower-court judge 10 days to release the youngsters from custody, but the state could appeal to the Texas Supreme Court and block that. Who has ever heard of rounding up 400+ kids, separating them from their mother and dividing them up across the state to various entities.</p>
<p>Every child at the Yearning For Zion Ranch in Eldorado was taken into custody more than six weeks ago after someone called a hot line claiming to be a pregnant, abused teenage wife. The girl has not been found and authorities are investigating whether the calls were a hoax.</p>
<p>A HOAX! The state kidnapped 400+ kids, traumatized them, and usurped the mother&#8217;s rights based on an unsupported claim. If it happened to them, it can happen to anyone!</p>
<p>Child-protection officials argued that five girls at the ranch had become pregnant at 15 and 16 and that the sect pushed underage girls into marriage and sex with older men and groomed boys to enter into such unions when they grew up. How about the weird concept of &#8220;presumed innocence&#8221;. Is that still a vaild point of law in America- or Texas?</p>
<p>Is judicial illegality better than polygamy?</p>
<p>More specifically, the court said, &#8220;Even if one views the FLDS belief system as creating a danger of sexual abuse by grooming boys to be perpetrators of sexual abuse and raising girls to be victims of sexual abuse &#8230; there is no evidence that this danger is &#8216;immediate&#8217; or &#8216;urgent&#8217;,&#8221; the court said. &#8220;Evidence that children raised in this particular environment may someday have their physical health and safety threatened is not evidence that the danger is imminent enough to warrant invoking the extreme measure of immediate removal.&#8221;</p>
<p>And the measures were extreme- beyond EXTREME! Can you say INSANE? </p>
<div style="margin:5px;padding:5px;border:1px solid #c1c1c1;font-size: 10px">As a spiritual-futurist my commentaries and articles deal primarily with an interpretation of current events in light of macro-universal forces at play, particularly leading up to 2012.</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mirrorofjustice.com/texas-family-law.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
