![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Tort Law |
MP are our representative / agent & us the principal how can agent go aheah make decision without consent? |
I mean it in legal terms of principal and agent. I know they have the vote or authority to represent us but does that mean they can act on our behalf even when we not at all agree with them ? and in the case of loss shouldnt Law of tort applies ? Please answer in detail . This has already been processed through the court. Once elected, the MP is a free agent. You are not a principle anymore than a minor stockholder is a principle in a decision of the Board of directors. No. We vote them into power and as a group decide that they are the best person for use to have as our Representative. As MP they sign a contract. Tort law is the name given to a body of law that creates, and provides remedies for, civil wrongs that do not arise out of contractual duties (Wikipedia). This nullifies your point and proves that you do not understand the Tort law. Tort law is compensation of losses due to negligence, nuisance, defamation, intentional, economic or competition torts. Statutory Tort would be the closest to this situation. This is when the Legislature imposes duties on public or private parties such as the Product Liability Directive, which gives manufacturers the responsibility of defective products causing harm. |
| Tags |
| Worker Compensation Law Wills Law Veterans Law Trusts Law Traffic Law Tort Law Telecommunications Tax and Taxation Law Tech Law Sport Law Social Security Law Sexual Harassment |
| Related information |
negligence ...At it's most basic medical tort reform would seek to limit the awards in medical malpractice cases. This in turn would keep the price of medical malpractice insurance lower so that doctors wo... www.uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/inde... Erm... Sam Miller v The Queen? PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE I REALLY NEED HELP ON THAT. ...Seems like someone needs help with their homework. I think you are looking for product's liability. Maybe someone had a negligently designed chair, sits on it, and falls to the ground. To... ...in the act of tarnishing one other's reputation, one may also entice others' to act upon some implied situation of "other's" that causes further pain and suffering upon ... Some jurisdictions restrict an injured Worker to the Workers Compensation system and have abolished common law remedies. When there used to be common law rights here in South Australia the two t... Tort law only requires four elements to be shown: 1) The "tortfeasor" owed the injured party a duty to do something or not to do something 2) The tortfeasor breached that duty, based on... This begs the question of how you want to reform tort law! Most people talk of tort reform in the context of making it more equitable--capping excessive recovery and limiting punitive damages, win... |
AD Service--Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |