Mirror of Justice - All about Law and More
*Home>>>Tort Law

TORT QUESTION: Has Williams vs. State been overturned?


Williams v. State says that the police does not have a duty to investigate in the absence of any special relationship with an individual such that the police may not be held negligent if they fail to investigate.

Has this been overturned by any recent jurisprudence?

After reading about 65 Williams v State cases, I gave up. However, currently, in my jurisdictions there exists : No duty for any law enforcement officer to respond or investigate to an individual (except if their own SOP requires them to do so, which is an internal "problem"). And soverign immunity is still intact on any civil liability should they not respond or investigate. Post the citation. It is unlikely that will ever change. Officers and departments would be liable if they had 2 officers on duty and 50 crimes/ calls occurred at once; situations that are not under their control

Tags
  Worker Compensation Law   Wills Law   Veterans Law   Trusts Law   Traffic Law   Tort Law   Telecommunications   Tax and Taxation Law   Tech Law   Sport Law   Social Security Law   Sexual Harassment
Related information
  • What law covers Tort Law in Federal or Circuit Court in MI? Best answer receives 10 pts!?

    Michigan state law, unless a federal statute has been violated. Torts: negligence, fraud, etc. are generally tried in state courts. The only time torts would be tried in federal court is when f...

  • Trespass to the person is no longer a significant tort?

    There are about 5 different ways to answer this question. Without knowing the purpose of the question, it is difficult to answer. Is this for an undergrad class of some sort? If you are speaking of...

  • What is the significants of Rylands -vs- Fletcher in tort Law?

    With language usage like that I doubt questioner is in law school. Rylands v. Fletcher (1868)[1] LR 3 HL 330 is a landmark English legal case in which the Court of the Exchequer Chamber first ap...

  • What tort did Lee commit? And would he have to pay the money for the other car?

    This is a trespass to chattels issue. Your brother trespassed upon the other vehicle, and caused the damage. Therefore he has to pay....but why are you in the middle of this?

    ...
  • Can someone check over some answers for me and tell me which ones are not correct.?

    #10 is wrong. It is an intentional tort. Some of the answers are a little short and am unable to give an opinion. Sounds like they are correct but double check 3 and 4. OK?

    ...
  • What should i do i have no money no where to go? my land lord is harrashing me.?

    for god sake, get a job although it's only a temporary job. you don't have money to pay the rent but you need to feed your child.

    ...
  • Tort Law help 2!?

    Even if a statement weren't correct a tort would have to have damages. What was the statement? What was the impact? Who said the statement? To whom was the statement made to? ...

  • Is canadian tort law superior than to tort law in US?

    What do you mean by "better"? There are a few differences, but the biggest differences fall into the 'remedies' category. In Canada, the courts keep a fairly tight leash on ...

  •  

    Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster