|
|
| *Home>>>Securities Law |
If you are in favor of boarder security, do you think we should ship out the blacks while we're at it? |
Or maybe we could try to deport the Indians too... I'm just saying, isn't our divine right to assure a completely Christian state? I hope this is your lame attempt to be funny because you are apparently suggesting caucasions are the only ones who are 'supposed' to be here. Not only are you being blatantly racist, but ignorant, as well. Someone needs to brush up on American history. I'm fine with deporting Indians, nothing wrong with sending them back to India if they came here illegally. Sure they tend to be very intelligent and take high-tech jobs, BUT I don't want people who broke the law to get here. Oh wait you meant Native Americans didn't you? Can't deport people who beat us here, no where to send them to. Also Reservations aren't on the same law system they are kind of a Country within a Country. What does not wanting illegal immigrants here have to do with Blacks though? I'm all for shipping some to Africa. They keep complaining they were brought here in shackles and they should get money for their ancestors being slaves, so send them back to Africa where they apparently want to be. are you saying that american indians and blacks should be deported? or indians from india? if anyone is here illegally they should go.color has nothing to do with it! we have russians,cheq's,turks,saudi's,kuwaitie's etc.grow up! Only if they are here illegally yes. You are trying to be funny or sarcastic but you are missing the point. The issue is not race, color or gender it is whether one is here legally or illegally. They are citizens....isn't that the difference? Not race but citizenship? Why does everything always have to be about race? Let the boarding house and boarders take care of their own security. Actually I think YOU should be deported. Caliguy 30 is right |
| Related information |
Not necessarily, it just means you don't lie and tell them you're a citizen if you're not because they'll do a background check. Just be completely truthful on your application... The sole intention of the ISA act was to suppress the communist and or during emergency time such as war. The ISA is actually not applicable during peace time. The reason as to why the USA , UK a... Both of them. I am for security but not at the expense of privacy. I am for privacy but not at the expense of security. So we need a balance. ...Since Bush got in office we have to have security at all large events. ...No they can't touch your disability check. ...depends on his disability, if he is not stable in his meds, his consultant could argue that he cannot fully function and then your aunt could get a power of attorney to look after his affairs until... It happens. You never know what evidence will be thrown out or how the Judge or jury will see the importance of something. If police were right 100% of the time, we wouldn't need trials ... it is always important to balance out the two. if there is to much security the country can be come a monarch which nobody wants. if there is too much freedom people can do things they should no do... |
AD Service--Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |