Do Homeland security funded hospitals malpractice, discriminate, or negate proper service?

Homeland security is a federal government agency involved in customs, drug enforcement and port security? What does this have to do with patient care?
Does George Bush implement the latter into hospitals so as to capitalize on the poor representation of those afflicted in cases against hospitals.
If so does HMO and record manipulation prior to Medicare and Medicaid billing result in questionable deaths?
Finally does this play into a favorable way for Congress to prevent insolvency of Social Security funds by saving money and not lives?
Homeland security after all was heavily funded after 911 when a disproportianate amount of money from all sectors of public coffers would be spent on a questionable war premised by neoconservatives with ties to the oil industry and hellbent on exploiting other nations for such services.

I don't understand your question.

Homeland Security does not fund or manage any hospitals, HMOs, records, social security or patient care facilities.

In fact Homeland Security does fund certain states as well as their hospitals. Search Connecticut Post circa Oct-Nov 2002 and you shall see for yourself. Better yet google the particulars such as terrorism, Homeland Security, Defense Spending, Connecticut. Report It

FOI and Search hospital billing and medical records to ascertain whether Medicare primary and Medicaid secondary are beneficial to elderly and young alike. Report It

This affects an vast demographic group as with retirement comes benefits of having worked most or part of your life. Report It

What the hell. Can you repost this in English.