![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Medical Malpractice |
Do I have a case for medical malpractice? |
I had a hysterectomy in the spring, no complications. At my six week checkup, my GYN said that I was healed and could resume normal activities including sex. A week later, after my husband and I had sex, my intestines came out and I had to be rushed to the hospital for emergency surgery. I was hospitalized for 5 days and now have chronic pelvic pain. Dr's commented that this is an extremely rare event but nobody will say my hysterectomy surgeon made a mistake, even though the intestine that came out looked perfect, there was no blood when it happened and there was no scars on the intestine indicating that they had been sutured in. I saw one of the top attys in our city and they said there is no proof of dr error. I have researched this and the #1 reason for this happening is poor surgical technique, there are also other reasons like obesity and diabetes, but that doesnt apply to me...my question is how can one prove malpractice if no dr will incriminate another? Please help me. First of get a attorney in another city, because some attorney are either affiliated with the hospital of docters in your city some do some research before you give all your information to a attorney, also see if they specialize in malpractice and their success in cases that they have won. Hope this helps,good luck If you have an attorney, that is the first step. They have a duty (if you haev retained them) to search for experts in the field to research the case and make their recommendations. Many attorneys use a CLNC (certified legal nurse consultant) to do the leg work and let them know if they have a case. i doubt that it is solely because they dont want to incriminate him...some doctors make their livings as those that incriminate others...this could be bad luck or you could be a lucky lady with a well endowed husband firstly, i am sorry to hear what you have gone through. if no one from the hospital (doctors or nurses) will state that something went wrong in your surgery, or that they believe your doc did something wrong, or forgot to do something, then its going to be a tough case. yes your attorney can find experts that say that he did do something that resulted in your having to have an emergency surgery, but you better believe that the hospital is going to have a TON of people to back them up (they have more to lose). also, the hospital will probably claim that they did nothing wrong, and that it was your gyn who should have told you that you needed more time to heal. and they may try to prove that you did something to yourself that impeded your proper healing.... but whatever you decide to do, good luck! Had it happened earlier, you might have had a case. That it didn't happen in the first six weeks puts it solidly in the realm of bad luck, not bad technique. Unfortunetly I don't think you'll be successful at a trial. Bad outcomes does not directly equal a bad doctor most of the time. Basically you'd have to get other doctors to say that either the advice or procedure was not reasonable in any sense of the word...that in itself is almost impossible to prove. If you keep looking for lawyers, you'll find a doctor to say it was malpractice. Keep looking for a doctor who will help you -- or a lawyer, because you totally have a case. Ouch. |
| Related information |
Any action for personal injury or death against a physician or hospital must be filed within two years from the date the claimant knew or reasonably should have known of the injury. In no instance... There could be a number of reasons he is having a problem getting a lawsuit moving forward. One many physicians are being discouraged by their colleagues and medical facilities from reviewing an... Here is a website that contains all of the information that you will need to know. www.mcandl.com/pennsylvania.html ...I think you should...I'm not sure about the Nevada state laws though. You might want to check out the Nevada State Website if you haven't done so already. If you cannot sue the hospital w... YES! But you should act quickly... there's a Statute of Limitations for your claim... it's basically a time clock that starts ticking when the problem happens and only gives you a shor... No - the defendant is not "exonerated" (meaning adjudged that they "did not commit" malpractice). The issue is merely not "adjudicated" (meaning they are not going to... Nope. In California (assuming this was for you, an adult), medical malpractice actions must be filed within one year from the date that you knew, or should have known, of the injury or three years ... You unfortunately don't require a law student to debate your serious problem. If you have the money for a court trial you should sue....without question. Visit a prominent attorney who speci... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |