![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Legal Malpractice |
Why do medical malpractice cases take so long to get through our legal system? |
Why do medical malpractice cases take so long to get through our legal system? They take so long because of the frivolous nature of the malpractice cases. Medical malpractice cases are usually due to some jamoke who wants to squeeze money for a frivolous reason. I know of no cases in our legal system that take little time because our legal system is all messed up! lawyers can do so many things to get more time, and there are so many rules to follow are red tape to go through. it sucks, believe me. because they hold the little guy back from justice and when ur the one on trail they run u straight into the jail! guilty or not! Unfortunately the reason is because there is so many fraud cases out there it hurts the ones who really need to get their claims settled. BECAUSE IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, LAWS ARE WRITTEN BY LAWYERS AND THEY ARE THE ONLY ONES THAT UNDERSTAND THE LAWS Because it is the nature of the beast. Many states, like California, have attempted to shorten the process by mandating a "fast track" policy. In theory, a case should be disposed of within one year of filing. I'm a third year law student. The reason is because you have to go through discovery. This takes time, money, deliberation, etc. Believe me...if you got a fast med mal case you would NOT win and neither would you be happy! Med mal cases are VERY complicated because lawyers have to take medical information, learn it in depth (remember, most of us went to law school because we don't like science) and then try to convey what they are trying to say to a a lay juror who also didn't go to medical school. There is a lot learning in the process. ONe doctor will say one thing and one another so the lawyer has to cover all basis. BUT I will admit that some lawyers use "delay tactics" in order to buy more time but if you were that lawyer's client, you probably would appreciate that tactic if it would win your case. End point? Be patient. If you have a claim, it will pay off in the long run. Lawyers are trying to cross all ts and dot all "i"s--otherwise you could turn around and sue them for legal malpractice because they DIDN'T do something that would have cost more time. Think about it. |
| Tags |
| Personal Injury Law Native American Law Military Law Medical Malpractice Mediation Legal Malpractice Legal Ethics Landlord and Tenants Labor Law Juvenile Law Investment Law Intellectual Property |
| Related information |
Dr Jones will have to testify as to the care and background in order to defend himself against the malpractice suit. If he could not testify on the patient's care it would make it impossible ... Public defenders must see that their clients obtain due process from the courts, they do not have a duty of due process themselves. If you are claiming a Constitutional issue, then you can sue i... Contact the Cook County or Illinois Bar Association and ask for referrals to malpractice attorneys. ...For attorney malpractice, generally 4 years, or 2 years from date plaintiff knows, or should have known, of the facts that constitute the cause of action. ...You said bono. That's cool. ...Sounds like a possible Med/Mal case. When a doctor of any kind reads an x-ray, they are responsible to read "the four corners" of the x-ray, and not just the portion that interests them. ... Legal aid in your county or the county clerk's office ...Check at Courthouse. ... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |