![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Juvenile Law |
Why does MA automatically try juveniles charged with Murder I & II in adult court? Shouldnt there be a waiver |
If the Juvenile Justice system is designed to act in the best interest of the child, while protecting the public, why does MA automatically try juveniles charged with Murder I & II in adult court? Why aren鈥檛 they sent to a waiver first, to see if their needs and the public鈥檚 can be met by the juvenile system instead of the adult court and adult prisons? Are you serious? So they can do it again because they feel they beat the system. A waiver are you serious! Because murder is the highest crime you can commit! Do you think a child who kills at 12 should be on the streets in 6 years like it's okay to take a human life. People should be more concerned why most states don't have self defense for victims and raped and abused men and woman serve life sentences The state legislature decided that some crimes deserve more punishment than the juvie court can handle. Juvie court loses its jurisdiction when the kid turns 18 or 21. So, putting aside rehabilitation and deterence, the legislature decided that murder had to be handled by a court that will never lose jurisdiction and can hand down sufficient punishment and protect society from dangerous people for a long enough time. Most states have similar laws, with some variation. BTW, the whole notion of a special court for juveniles is pretty modern. There were none in the u.s. before 1907. Juveniles who committed crimes were tried and sentenced same as anyone else. Murder I and II represent intentional efforts to cause the death of another human being. Individuals who can be proven guilty of comitting murder I or II are generally psychologically different from "normal" citizens in such a way that they are extremely likely to continue comitting similar, and associated crimes for the rest of their life. Murder I and II are significantly different from manslaughter, wrongful death, and any other crime in which a death could be the result. They represent planning, and malicious intent, usually without any sense of remorse or extenuating circumstances. |
| Tags |
| Mediation Legal Malpractice Legal Ethics Landlord and Tenants Labor Law Juvenile Law Investment Law Intellectual Property Insurance Law Immigration Law Health Care Law |
| Related information |
what state bud? it depends on the state. some may elect some may appoint. laws are different go here: ... Children invariably live up to the expectations set for them. Teachers can help to reinforce certain ideas, but primary influence comes from the profiling done by parents. In instances in which par... Someone under 18, or in some states 16, who is criminally tried as a child, not as an adult. ...You're right. it is a double standard under the law. Until your 18th birthday you cannot vote, you "lack capacity to contract" (a legal rule that allows a defense for ANYONE under ... For Murder yes. ...YES. They absolutely should. This 'minor' **** is completely irrelavant. They were fully aware of what they were doing at the time they were doing it. They should be held 100% account... By the age of 13, a person understands that if they murder someone, it is forever. They know the difference between right and wrong. So yes, if they commit a crime, they should be treated as an a... Hey Cork, his facts are correct - at least in Washington state. Several years ago I had a pervert teenager living around the corner from me. He'd committed sexual crimes SEVERAL TIMES and was ... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |