![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Insurance Law |
I have a friend who took a life insurance policy out on her husband what do you think about this? |
Okay, a good pal of mine -- to make a long story short took a life insurance policy out on her husband and "signed his name". She thinks it's "not hurting anyone", but the main and only thing I'd like to know is legally, if she's ever found out later, can she get into trouble for doing this? It is clear that a wife has an insurable interest in the life of her husband. Valid forms of insurable interest include being a spouse, being financially dependent on the person, or situations where there is joint ownership of real property or a business. Yes, she forged the guys name, therefore it is classed as fraud. I can understand why she would do this, but it is not legal. If it's many years before he dies, likely she won't ever be found out. If he should die within a couple of years or under suspicious circumstances, insurance policies are one of the things looked at for motives and the policy probably won't stand up to scrutiny. Forgery of a signature is a felony. So, she can certainly get into legal trouble for doing this. Furthermore, this isn't very ethical. There are other, moral and legal approaches to resolving these issues. She could get found out if something comes in the mail and he opens it, or the insurance agent makes a service call, etc. Well, forgery is a crime, and if her husband ever dies of unnatural causes, guess who's going to be the first suspect. IF THE HUSBAND IS FOUND DEAD YOU KNOW WHO KILLED HIM Well, My wife signs my check and cashes it. Will she get into trouble. No! But!! If I then make a complaint about it then she could very well get into trouble. Same with the Insurance. If no one complains then no one will get into trouble. the insurance compamy assumes the husband gave permission. ... ( Note: The bank does know about are arrangement....Not sure about his/her insurance company ) As above posters have correctly indicated, it is forgery and fraud and should he pass, if an investigator inquired and found out the facts, the most she would be entitle to would be her premiums for the life insurance, not the actual policy, and would likely be charged criminally for her misdeeds. |
| Tags |
| Legal Ethics Landlord and Tenants Labor Law Juvenile Law Investment Law Intellectual Property Insurance Law Immigration Law Health Care Law General Civil Litigation Family Law Estates Law |
| Related information |
There are many, many factors that decide the answer to this question. You don't provide nearly enough information. Did you agree to do this? There should be a written agreement stating what yo... So you noticed electrical problems occurring and took no action to correct the problem and now are looking for someone to blame for your own negligence? Maybe you can get lucky if there was a recal... Maybe, maybe not. Depends on what you signed. If you are thinking about suing them, gather the paperwork and see a lawyer. If someone said of course, were you going to do it yourself? ...You need to have a death certificate before any payouts are made. It is true that people have come back from a few minutes of cardiac arrest. So, since you are respirating, the doctor can't... The federal government does not regulate insurance, which is a matter for the states. Premiums are determined by risk as assessed by insurers, subject to certain limits established by the states... Actually it would be better to get the damn politicians out of the insurance game. Forbid them to have any interest in it and the price wouldn't have gone up so high in the first place. As... Wrong...heart attacks is numero uno. Men have more HA than women. Pregnancy is a result of both a man & a woman. You didn't know that? ...If you weren't ticketed for the accident, no harm no foul. Just make sure you have current insurance when you go to court. That can be done online today, right this minute. I got a tick... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |