![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Environmental Law |
Environmental laws and regulations are too costly and can not be justified by their benefits.? |
Do you agree or disagree? Explain using specific examples where possible. It depends on which laws your talking about. A cost, benefit analysis needs to be done in each case. Environmental laws have their place. People want to live in a clean environment. If we didn't have any environmental laws we'd be have some of the horrific environmental problems that China is having right now, except they'd be a lot worse because we've been industrialized much longer. That is Bush's excuse for not signing the Kyoto protocol, which would reduce greenhouse gases. "It would hurt the economy". That's his logic agree We can't continue to screw up the planet forever, so something must be done. It is more a matter of the cost of NOT doing anything outweighing the cost of implementing some regulations. Some are good, like cleaning up our rivers, etc. But you're right, most cannot be justified on a cost/benefit basis. And all of the people who are falling all over themselves to vote for "Green" candidates will go to the wall to prevent a nuclear power plant in their locale. The real threat to the environment comes from the 3rd world countries that burn wood for heat, and use animals for transportation. And their leaders fought successfully to have them exempted in the Kyoto protocol. By and large, proponents of environmental regulations have an ulterior motive. |
| Tags |
| Immigration Law Health Care Law General Civil Litigation Family Law Estates Law Environmental Law Entertainment Law Employment Law Elder Law Education Law DUI Law |
| Related information |
States and lower jurisdictions can do just that. In fact, that's the whole point about federal standards; states, counties and such cannot have lower standards because it violates federal law... What we don't need is more courts and lawyers! you would have to explain two things first - why this would be needed (or why our current civil and criminal system is insufficient to supply ... SEE THE WEBSITES!!!! www.iela.info/about.htm www.sustainable.ie/resources/environme... ...The study on second hand smoke. It was proven to be scientifically bogus, and ruled as false report by the U.S. Supreme court, yet many states are using the report for banning smoking in public bu... Who exactly are "We" ? If its the USA, no, the Kyoto Protocol is still not signed by "we".. ...I guess you could make the argument that certain environmental regulations increase the cost of doing business for some employers thereby decreasing funds available to increase wages and expand wor... very good money. considering the lucrative way they have been able to sue and litigate the Federal Government with frivolous lawsuits. They have been able to sue and when they lose, they lose no mo... Can you believe they got $132 million for as little as they contributed to that case? Life just ain't fair! (Sorry; don't know their names.) ... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |