Mirror of Justice - All about Law and More
*Home>>>Entertainment Law

Entertainment Law Question #8?


"If He Were My Guy" is a song written by Charles Composer. It was first published in 1935. Composer died in 1940. Prior to his death, Composer granted a synchronization license to Dynamic Studio authorizing the studio to record and use the song in the soundtrack for one of its movies and authorizing it to distribute the song "in all media and by any means, now known or hereafter invented" for the "entire duration" of the song's copyright "including all renewals and extensions thereof". Composer's widow had renewed the song's copyright in 1963, 28 years after its first publication, but she has not contacted Dynamic for any reason since doing so. Dynamic used the song in that movie, and that movie was exhibited in movie theaters and was later broadcast on TV, but it hadn't been exploited until recently since the late 1950's. This year, Dynamic released the movie again, on VHS as part of their classic series, but did not obtain permission from Composer's widow to do so. Should it have?

Nope, not a law school final. Although I am considering going to law school. :o) We'll see. This was my last semester of undergraduate and I took an Entertainment Law class, just to see if I liked law. We had an exam that we took home and used our book to answer. I've already developed all my answers and turned in my work. (I got an A in the class overall!!) But we don't get our final exam back to see if our answers were right, so I thought I'd test my luck and see if any lawyers out there could tell me what they thought so I could see if my answers were correct. Almost all the questions can go to either side, its just trying to support your choice in side. But some, like this one, I think are pretty clear cut. Thanks for answering!!!

Sounds like a Law School Final. Is it?

"Under the law in effect before 1978, copyright was secured either on the date a work was published or on the date of registration if the work was registered in unpublished form. In either case, the copyright lasted for a first term of 28 years from the date it was secured. The copyright was eligible for renewal during the last (28th) year of the first term. If renewed, the copyright was extended for a second term of 28 years. If not renewed, the copyright expired at the end of the first 28-year term. The term of copyright for works published with a year date in the notice that is earlier than the actual date of publication is computed from the year date in the copyright notice."

The copyright probably expired in 1991, making it public domain. If it is in public domain, there would be no need to get permission.

Tags
  Health Care Law   General Civil Litigation   Family Law   Estates Law   Environmental Law   Entertainment Law   Employment Law   Elder Law   Education Law   DUI Law   Drunk Driving Law
Related information
  • Entertainment Law Question #14?

    Yes, according to the Code. MM would probably face fines... "1700.4. (a) "Talent agency" means a person or corporation who engages in the occupation of procuring, offering, promi...

  • Can entertainment establishments such as a concert hall legally prevent you from taking in bottles of water?

    Any place of business at any time reserves the right to refuse service to any of it's patrons. Legally all they can do is not allow you in with the water. They can't confiscate it against...

  • Entertainment Law Question #17?

    The likely outcome is that BP would not be successful. Okay, so first we have to determine what type of arrangement exists between BP and WW. WW had contract with BP for first novel, but only...

  • Entertainment Law #4?

    That's a sticky question and it happens all the time. In the case of a real producer, they negociate a title, give him a fat fee and a free office on the lot for two years or so. This is c...

  • Entertainment Law Question #16?

    Same answers from your last question, but I would add that the likelihood of AIE being able to obtain damages is probably greater. The length of time between the agreement (contract) between SS an...

  • Entertainment Law Question #2?

    The precedent has already been set. You can't use the Marx Brothers commercially without negociating rights with the family, same applies to Charlie Chaplin. Say, for example, you want to us...

  • Entertainment Law Question #1?

    Because of the scandal, and the public nature of the subsequent hearings, Mr. Van Doren could be considered a public figure. While a limited amount of license could be exercised with the facts per...

  • Entertainment Law Question #6?

    Wow. You're GETTING BETTER AT THIS That's a toughy. A crafty lawyer would have to WRANGLE a judge. This is one of those cases you try in Minneapolis MN, which has no movie industr...

  •  

    Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster