![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Education Law |
Does every human being have a right to basic shelter, food, health-care, and education? |
I am speaking only about the very basic needs. I guess it makes me a democrat to answer that yes, I do think so. Although it is sad to think that some people can not afford these things. All people are created equal and everybody should have the same opportunities as their neighbor. I honestly think that if done properly, a Marxist nation would succeed and prosper. Shame nobody else thinks that way. Absolutely not! Survival of the fittest. Try working in health care or education. Maybe you'll see just how worthless people are. They get all these handouts so they don't ever have to do anything to survive. Our society is much to coddling. Yes, but how we achieve that standard of equality is a problem no nation has been able to solve fully. Not really. People try to project their own beliefs upon the world, but it exists as it is no matter how people wish it were otherwise. Rights are never automatic. No. Unfortunately, No. Maybe in some utopian world they might, but in the real world, NOBODY has a basic RIGHT to food, shelter, health-care and education... Yes! It should not be survival of the fittest. If that is the way it is going to be then we are at the same level as animals. Nope Yes, I need a check for shelter, food, health-care and my education please mail it to There are really several factors to consider here. One, you have to decide if those are things that every person by virtue of simply existing is entitled to. Two, if they are -- who is obligated to provide them? I don't see how that could be. Who will provide these things and how will they be compensated. Wouldn't that mean that some other person could be forced to build them a home, plant and harvest food for them, and provide medical attention and teach their children. There's a word for that its called slavery. I don't see where anyone rights should permit them to make slaves of anyone else. Of course! With the surplus amounts of food that's wasted and cheap building material, there's no reason that people should go hungry or not have a dry place to live. The hard part is finding the resources to get the supplies to where they're needed. I'm not sure about their entitlement to all these things but as a civilized human I am duty bound to try to provide these basics for others. If the rest of my society is unwilling to do this voluntarily then I guess my government is the best provider. In addition, providing basic food, shelter, care, and education for all results in social benefits over the long term. Does that make me a leftie? I always thought it made me a Christian. The Declaration of Independence, one of the foundationa,documents of the United States, states that we have the "right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness"> No, they don't have rights to those things. I am not sure that it is a right to have all of those things. But I do believe that the government has a duty to do everything in it's power to give those things to its citizens. The problem is what is considered basic. Does that include television, college education, best food, etc. ? And what is the human beings requirement? Every human being has the duty to work to their ability. Every human has the duty to obey the laws. Every human has the duty to help others. If they don't does that negate the government's duty to provide for them? As a matter of decency, yes. |
| Tags |
| Family Law Estates Law Environmental Law Entertainment Law Employment Law Elder Law Education Law DUI Law Drunk Driving Law Divorce Law Discrimination Law Disability |
| Related information |
I truly hope not. If your parents are responsible, they feel the same way. Hunting alone is a very dangerous proposition. What happens if you are injured while you are alone? It's not just you... Talking about leading by example. Do you at least who the LTTE leader is. He is a blood thirsty murderer. Next to osama bin laden. Or may be bin laden comes after him. ...She was only on a 1 year contract, her contract was up, and the board decided not to renew it. Her leave time would have started after the end of her contract, therefore she is not covered under FM... Since it was a civil trail and not a criminal trial, they were the plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiffs were thirteen Topeka parents on behalf of their twenty children. The named plaintiff, O... getting a good job ...It's not in the Constitution, it's just good policy. A smarter America is a better America. ...It would work for some people. Many people are going to be bad anyway. But since it would help some then it is worth hollering to influential people about. You never know what can happen! ...The government should not be subsidizing any of the entertainment industry, not the arts, and many other areas. Take all the money the government gives entertainment and put it to education (and tr... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |