Mirror of Justice - All about Law and More
*Home>>>Constitutional Law

If you have a constitutional right to confront your accuser, then why do we have anonymous tip lines?

Where you don't have to leave your name? Especially ones that offer rewards to anonymous tipsters.

A person who was so inclined could call Crimestoppers and have the police raid the house of anyone they felt like.

In the United States, you do not have a Constitutional right to confront your accuser.

The Sixth Amendment grants that "In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to... be confronted with the witnesses against him".

Thus, your right is to confront witness at your trial. This prevents anonymous statements from being introduced at your trial, but they can be used as evidence to get a search warrant, or to further develop the case or find more evidence.

While a person could call Crimestoppers, they cannot "have the police raid the house of anyone they felt like". To search someone's house, you have to have a warrant, issued by a magistrate (judge), based on probable cause, and the warrant must specifically describe what will be searched (i.e. the requirements of the Fourth Amendment).

Furthermore, anonymous tips may or may not be used as evidence to get a search warrant. If the police want to use an informant, the "totality of the circumstances" must show that the informant's information seems true, that the informant is reliable, and that the informant has some basis for their knowledge. If you want to learn more, look up Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983).

I hope this helps!

Once they have collected the evidence, the state becomes the accuser, not the person who gave the tip. For example, Jane calls a tip line and says that John has kiddy porn on his computer. The police find kiddy porn. The state makes a case against John. Now the state is accusing him. Of course it is relevant that Jane called in determining whether or not the warrant was valid in the first place but she really is no longer the accuser, the state is accusing John of committing the crime.

The person giving the tip is not the accuser. If the tip leads to evidence of a crime, the DA can choose to prosecute, the DA becomes the accuser. The tipper merely provided evidence.

Tags
　　Discrimination Law 　　Disability 　　Criminal Law 　　Collections Law 　　Consumer Law 　　Construction Law 　　Constitutional Law 　　Computer Law 　　Child Custody 　　Civil Rights Law 　　Business Law 　　Bankruptcy Law
Related information
  • At what point is censorship violating our constitutional right to freedom of speech?

    Oliver Wendell Holmes said something like "Your rights end where my nose begins" (not exactly that but the meaning is much the same) You can be censored if what you write or say endanger...

  • Is it against our Constitutional Rights to have a curfew implemented on an entire city?

    No, the constitution clearly allows for the president and congress to override certain rights for public health and safety, and sometimes war. It states that Habius Corpus may be suspended during w...

  • Do you smoke Marijuana?

    It should be legal, but i don't like it, never really have.

    ...
  • There are three types of law?

    I disagree with this way of breaking down the law, because I do not distinguish "Constitutional" law from civil or criminal law. But here goes. Criminal law describes a group of actio...

  • Can and does the F.B.I. go after people who buy or sell Medical Marijuana?

    In this case, the courts have determined that federal law has precedence under the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. This is where things get very strange: Even though someone can grow it f...

  • The constitution: What legal case/issue should i take?

    Here is a site with the results of U.S. Supreme Court cases. If anything has constitutional relevance, it would be cases argued in front of the Supreme Court.

    ...
  • Is the "Pro-Choice" (yea I know Pro-abortion), so called Constitutional right to kill children, a grossly?

    Non it was a law suite, not what the framers of the constitution had in mind.

    ...
  • Lawyers and constitutional experts- which amendments has Bush violated?

    uh...none.

    ...
    • 　

    AD Service--Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster