![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Constitutional Law |
Is the "Pro-Choice" (yea I know Pro-abortion), so called Constitutional right to kill children, a grossly? |
flawed amoral position? Will history judge us as animalistic barbarians for killing our own offspring? I am against the death penelty TOO! Non it was a law suite, not what the framers of the constitution had in mind. Congratulations, you have just won the prize for posting the most ridiculous and pathetic question on Yahoo Answers. Have a knitting needle. Report Abuse 1) If a woman is raped and can not go through with the pregnancy, abort. If you substitute gun for slavery it fits well too. relax.... life is simple.... if you don't believe in abortion... don't get one... as you say: God will judge us all..... The basic issue is: If laws were to dictate morals we'd live in a nanny state theocracy. Funny how you did not choose to insert the words "Death Penalty". I always find it amusing that anti-choice people want to force a woman to carry an embryo to term, no matter whether the child is a result of rape, incest, a child that will have a debilitating disease or carrying the child will harm or kill the mother yet once the birth occurs they will be more than happy to kill the person. They do not consider state sanctioned murder "amoral" yet they consider a woman making a personal decision as to her own body "amoral" now that's just plain stupid. |
| Tags |
| Discrimination Law Disability Criminal Law Collections Law Consumer Law Construction Law Constitutional Law Computer Law Child Custody Civil Rights Law Business Law Bankruptcy Law |
| Related information |
uh...none. ...ex post facto. it means "after the fact" ...they can deny someone entry to their bar for any reason at all, or no reason actually. You have no constitutional right to access to their establishment, so no, they didn't violate any of you... Number 2. According to the 4th amendment of the united states which says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and... Yes. We could. And we should. In fact, we should scrap damn near every federal law. The federal government should: (a) provide national security, (b) provide for interstate trade, (c) sevre... well, what you are talking about is a standard corporate liability issue, called "piercing the veil". you only frame it with a controversial group, but the issue itself is not controve... Nope. The laws are way too lenient. We should bar anybody with any kind of a drug conviction from any job where judgment is required. ...Awwww I think I love you for posting this. ... |
AD Service--Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |