SEARCH WARRANT question plz 10 pts help!!!?

Which one of the following search warrants issued to the police would most likely be upheld as constitutional under the fourth amendment?

1. A search warrant issued based on an officer鈥檚 reasonable suspicion that allows the officer to search a particular house, but only for illegal drugs.
2. A search warrant issued based on an officer鈥檚 probable cause that allows the officers to search a particular house, based on illegal drugs.
3. A search warrant issued based on an officer鈥檚 reasonable suspicion that allows the officer to search a particular house for anything illegal.
4. A search warrant issued based on an officer鈥檚 probable cause that allows the officers to search a particular house for anything illegal.

Number 2. According to the 4th amendment of the united states which says, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized"
But it would need to be modified to say, "A search warrant issued based upon an officer's probable cause allowing for search of a particular house for the seizure of illegal narcotics." And they would need proof of narcotics being sold/used in the house. It would need to provide a scope of which areas may be searched in the house.

The amendment specifies that judicially sanctioned search and arrest warrants must be supported by probable cause and be limited in scope according to specific information supplied by a person (usually a law enforcement officer) who has sworn by it and is therefore accountable to the issuing court.
Source Wikipedia

so option 2 would be the only one that should be upheld by a court.