Mirror of Justice - All about Law and More
*Home>>>Constitutional Law

ACLU and NAMBLA God Bless ACLU?


Here is a simplified version of what I understand. I will not be offended by corrections

ACLU didn't support NAMBLA in any criminal proceedings, it filed a friend of the court to argue against one specific constitutional item. A boy-lover murdered a boy and NAMBLA's only connection was the child molester had been to their website and downloaded some of their papers. As much as that disgusts us it's part of living in a free country. If they can't talk about loving boys you can't talk about loving Jesus. The law doesn't know the difference.

There was no one to sue for damages so lawyers being what they are searched for someone they could sue. The found NAMBLA Except NAMBLA didn't have anything. So the lawyers charged all the board members were guilty of the boys murder and they should be allowed to sue for damages (sue each board member)

Up to this point Board members had always been protected from lawsuits - this would change America in a bad way the fact the courts let it proceed was troubling, because this is how you set new precedents. If your daughter gets 'brainwashed" by church just sue the board members, if you husband dies after following the advice of the American Heart Association, sue the board members etc etc. ACLU did us all a huge favor and had to take the heat of assisting this vile group.

Who else would have protected your church board members if not the ACLU were any of these new right wing legal association willing to jump in for NAMBLA?

well, what you are talking about is a standard corporate liability issue, called "piercing the veil".

you only frame it with a controversial group, but the issue itself is not controversial - I am sure it is taught in any basic business class in any community college where incorporation of small businesses is covered.

without a link to an actual citation of the case you discuss, and given the potential for emotions on the groups allegedly involved, I will leave it at that.

but basically, the matter is routine routine routine. probably covered every day in every small claims court, only comes up here (if the case is real) because someone with deep pockets was looking for notoriety, and they found some attorneys willing to make their deep pockets more then a little shallower.

The ACLU is a ridiculous organization dedicated to complicating the lives of the people they feel owe them something.

Tags
  Discrimination Law   Disability   Criminal Law   Collections Law   Consumer Law   Construction Law   Constitutional Law   Computer Law   Child Custody   Civil Rights Law   Business Law   Bankruptcy Law
Related information
  • Are current marijuana laws sensible?

    Nope. The laws are way too lenient. We should bar anybody with any kind of a drug conviction from any job where judgment is required.

    ...
  • Marijuana - Illegal for the wrong reasons?

    Awwww I think I love you for posting this.

    ...
  • Companies wont hire me because of 3 Alcohol related incidences on record. What Can I Do?

    "This is against my constitutional rights"? I hope you are kidding. No employer can be forced to hire you. This is America not some communist country. I am glad that you are recoverin...

  • Marijuana - can you see reality?

    Legalize it.

    ...
  • 'Defacing' US money question??

    The current currency is not constitutional which is a strange thing, but it was started by FDR. As I understand it, the currency is being promulgated by fiat. Which means that no legal entity objec...

  • Who should pay for the textbook?

    I can only give a personal opinion. Sure, she should have asked before she wrote in the textbook. He may get less for the book because of the writing in it. However, I often would get a textbook...

  • Constitutional Taxation Question

    The Sixteenth Amendment "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several States, and without regard ...

  • If you are a completely private school are you still bound by the 14th ammendment to allow for due process?

    The constitution restricts the government only. Private corporations do not have to abide by the constitutional restrictions unless they are acting as an agent of the government. So no, constitu...

  •  

    AD Service--Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster