![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Collections Law |
How is this possible? Debt collection scare tactic again??!? |
I have wrote a few questions about my brother and a debt agency. Last week he told them he would be able to pay the debt off completely and that he was mailing it with a money order. He talked to his "rep" and a supervisor. Both said it was fine. 100% fine. They said he could send the money in the mail but for a month they have told him to give his checking account info to pay by phone and they would not sue. That doesn't sound very legal. It is never a good idea to pay off debt with money orders. Buying a money order is not proof of payment. All payments of this sort should be made by check so you have proof of payment (the cancelled check). It sounds like he has paid and there is no further need for this company to bug him. A lesson learned - this company is not one with which he wants to do any more business. you should read a book by Kevin Trudoue called DEBT CURES Try this website: Fine line between collection and badgering. There is a chance with a slow account of a MO getting screwed up in the mail and putting his account at risk; but that's his risk to take. These collectors will use any and all tactics that they can dream up to badger a person. In the first place, it would cost them more to sue your brother than the debt is worth so I seriously doubt they would sue him (they say pre-legal to scare people) and in the second place if he is still getting calls that is called harassment (harassment is illegal). He needs to tell them the next time they call that they are illegally harassing him and to STOP now. They know that they have to stop so he shouldn't be bothered again. The attempt to get the check over the phone is just another form of harassment and is not legal. it is but it will go away. When they tell you they need a check by phone, they just want your account numbers so in the future they can just charge youra ccount if need be. There are no problems with sending a cheque by post as long as its not a cash cheque and made out too the debt agency. Why they dont like accepting cheques is simply because it takes longer to process and there is a processing fee incurred on cheques, normally 5-10 working days to process cheques, if the cheque bounces then he will incur extra costs on top of what he already pays as the debt agency would have to pay the processing of the cheque. "The checks in the mail" is an old line. Collection agencies have heard it all before. |
| Tags |
| DUI Law Drunk Driving Law Divorce Law Discrimination Law Disability Criminal Law Collections Law Consumer Law Construction Law Constitutional Law Computer Law Child Custody Civil Rights Law |
| Related information |
No, it is not legal for you to "act as a collection agency". The collection industry is highly regulated and requires at minimum a business license. Since you would be collecting a fee, t... i think you might owe me money too, lol! ...If the product never worked you should have returned it. Don't even bring that up in court as it will look like an excuse. You should be prepared the day of court to pay the original $1500 ... You can get to Fed Law by doing a search on US Code. You should be able to get LA code thru the states web site. It does not hurt to be armed with a little knowledge about any laws he may be vio... Although the FDCPA does not specifically use the term "email" in its verbiage, it is safe to assume that collectors using email to contact you is not illegal. However, it is also safe to ... Tell them you should not be called at your place of employment and request they stop. then...Document, document, document. If it persists, you have legal grounds in small claims to sue for harrassm... If you received a summons, it means a court action has been filed against you. You, or someone on your behalf, will need to contact the creditor to see if you can arrange for some kind of settleme... I am not a lawyer. I could not find any reference to child support in the Servicemen's Civil Relief Act of 1940. (Link #1, below.) But I did find a reference (link #2, below) to a law (42 U... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |