Pro-Abortion 2008/Pro-Slave Owners 1850's...have you noticed they use the EXACT same arguments?

On August 2nd 1958 (3 years before the civil war) the Speaker of the House said the following: I persoanlly do not own a slave...yet I would NEVER stand in another man's LEGAL way of CHOOSING to own one....and I stand ready to FIGHT for his RIGHT to own a slave!

every single southern ERUPTED in Applause!!!!!!

Gen. Johnathon Brickner said: We must keep the black man this day and EVERY day a slave.....because there would be NO one to care and feed them.

Notice how they twist morality...notice how they justify the crime of slavery.....notice how they don't respect human life.

The Pro-Slave owners and the Pro-Abortion share they EXACT same ideology and would appear the Pro-Abortion advocates have borrowed the same arguments from the first Pro-Choice movenment 1845-1865

ok...get ready for the rock throwing, go back and READ in history what the Pro-Slave people were saying in that time...you will be shocked how the Pro-abortion people mirror their ancestors.

agree?

yup i see it, liberals like the other guy lie to themselves that they are morally sound, they don't think about the impact on the murdered child, or enslaved victim. unfortunately we are a dying breed.

Didn't even bother to read your blathering, your comparison is stupid and way off. A group of cells is not the same as a person being stripped of all freedoms, forced to work without pay.
Edit: If by dying breed, he means ignorant Bible beaters are disappearing, then awesome.

Wait a minute. No one is Pro Abortion some people are Pro Choice. If you are going to quote "facts" get it right!

Yes, I have noticed the pro-slavery and pro-abortion (a proper use of the word) people use the same arguments!

It's because it is the same evil people doing the same evil thing; those who believe humanity is not an expression of God.

Once they decided they would not follow God, they decided there was no right or wrong, then it became OK (in their minds) to enslave "another race" or murder babies. The legal term for this is "non-person".

And Alex, THIS http://www.hyscience.com/FetusHeadonSide... is NOT a "group of cells"!

Tags

　　Collections Law 　　Consumer Law 　　Construction Law 　　Constitutional Law 　　Computer Law 　　Child Custody 　　Civil Rights Law 　　Business Law 　　Bankruptcy Law 　　Banking Law 　　Aviation Law 　　Appeals and Writs

Related information

Should journalists and commentators be required to hold a state or federal license in their profession?

Absolutely not. That would be the best way for the government to step in and control the press. How do you think Zimbabwe got to where it was today? I'll tell you - they put "licenses&quo...

What does this law mean?

It means that you can be required to pay any parking fine involving your car, unless the car was taken without your consent. It also says that, if you have to pay, you can go after the driver to r...

I am wondering if I can sue my son's now ex attorney for slandering me to my son, to my friends via email.

I'm sorry you are unhappy with the legal outcome. However, your son was the attorney's client. Not you. You have no business making demands. It is not your place to complain about the...

First to answer gets 10 points! Criminal Consumer Law help!!?

1: Jurisprudence 2: Legislative 3: Constitution & BOR 4: BOR 5: Statutory

...

I would like to know what stand I should take against my manager for falsifying paperwork to discredit me?

Making false impelment for advantage is the charge, I truely think you need to speak to anther solicitor find one that offers first meeting free, I think you have a good case for both criminal and ...

Why is it so hard to find information about collecting a small-claims judgment?

Not until you get total satisfaction.

...

Under what circumstances or of what Act was habeas corpus suspended?

Habeus Corpus has never been suspended during the current administration. It was the governments position that the detainees in Gitmo, since they were not American citizens or residents, were n...

What gives people the right to reproduce?

to The Golden Buffalo, the right to reproduce is not the same as the right to eat. You eat if you can afford it. Just as it should be with children. You can have them if you can afford them. There ...