![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Civil Rights Law |
What does this law mean? |
Except as provided in Section 40209, the registered owner and driver, rentee, or lessee of a vehicle cited for any violation of any regulation governing the parking of a vehicle under this code, under any federal statute or regulation, or under any ordinance enacted by a local authority shall be jointly liable for parking penalties imposed under this article, unless the owner can show that the vehicle was used without consent of that person, express or implied. An owner who pays any parking penalty, civil judgment, costs, or administrative fees pursuant to this article shall have the right to recover the same from the driver, rentee, or lessee It means that you can be required to pay any parking fine involving your car, unless the car was taken without your consent. It also says that, if you have to pay, you can go after the driver to recover any part of the fine you had to pay. It means the owner of the vehicle is responsible for the cost of parking tickets that is issued to that vehicle. But they can in turn sue the driver to get the money back. |
| Tags |
| Collections Law Consumer Law Construction Law Constitutional Law Computer Law Child Custody Civil Rights Law Business Law Bankruptcy Law Banking Law Aviation Law Appeals and Writs |
| Related information |
I'm sorry you are unhappy with the legal outcome. However, your son was the attorney's client. Not you. You have no business making demands. It is not your place to complain about the... 1: Jurisprudence 2: Legislative 3: Constitution & BOR 4: BOR 5: Statutory ...Making false impelment for advantage is the charge, I truely think you need to speak to anther solicitor find one that offers first meeting free, I think you have a good case for both criminal and ... Not until you get total satisfaction. ...Habeus Corpus has never been suspended during the current administration. It was the governments position that the detainees in Gitmo, since they were not American citizens or residents, were n... to The Golden Buffalo, the right to reproduce is not the same as the right to eat. You eat if you can afford it. Just as it should be with children. You can have them if you can afford them. There ... not remotly possible under US law ...You might try reading 2e. Also read 3. This document does NOT support your position. ... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |