![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Civil Rights Law |
Concerning the article below about hanging a noose from the back of your truck? |
during a civil rights march. Isn't that kind of free speech/protest protected by the constitution? It is almost as if the government wants to legislate who or what a person hates. It is still legal in the united states to hate a person because of race, religion, age, sex or any other criteria an individual chooses right? Listen.. this is a very important subject... it affects us all and can change the way courts decide on our fundamental constitutional rights. These assholes drove around with ropes attached behind their truck.. yes, they are morons, yes they are ignorant, yes they should be removed from the gene pool, but THEY HAVE A RIGHT TO DO IT. Yes, they shouldnt provoke violence, but if they were just riding around with the ropes behind their truck, that was THEIR WAY OF EXPRESSING THEIR HATRED TOWARD BLACKS. This should be something we should ALL fight for. Today nooses, tomorrow it'll be protesters with anti-government signs calling them terrorists or for being against the government ( AND IT IS ALREADY HAPPENING - look at the WTO protests that happen every single year). Expression is a fundamental right we as Americans should hold dear - and if that means defending these assholes' right to do it, then we should do it. Look at the BIG picture, and not just at these assholes... Now.. if these assholes were ordered by police to leave the area being the noose behind their truck was antagonizing the jena protesters, and they didn't, then that's different. They showed up to protest the jena protesters without a permit.... so they should not have the right to protest at that location... and they should be charged with disorderly conduct if they do not leave.. NOT A HATE CRIME... Look at the BIG PICTURE... this is not the kind of thing we want to leave to the government to decide for us. Are you saying you could defend that type of behavior?? it is free speech and should be protected as such. that doesn't mean that is isn't racist, ignorant, just plain distasteful bullshit though. but that opinion is also free speech :) The nose crosses the line to advocating action and threats. that is not free speech. Saying you hate all blacks, jews, gays or whatever would be OK, but once you advocate actual violence, as evidenced by the nose, they crossed a line. Not to say he can't and won't fight the charge. He may even win, but hanging the nose is a lot different that simple speech. |
| Tags |
| Collections Law Consumer Law Construction Law Constitutional Law Computer Law Child Custody Civil Rights Law Business Law Bankruptcy Law Banking Law Aviation Law Appeals and Writs |
| Related information |
ya that really is bull ...there are mixed rulings I think in cases involving anti-abortion radicals posting names and addresses of doctors and others, and similar cases. Probably an open question depending on the specifi... That happens day in and day out I here it on my radio all of the time when people get pulled over for speeding and they have an outstanding warrant, opps time to go downtown and see the man. Not re... What in the world are you asking? You have GOT to clean this up and make some sense out of it if you want people to give you a decent answer. Wow. ...The answers above are all around the correct answer, but no one answer hits it exactly. Deposition practice varies by state. In most states, the only person who can come into the deposition with... You know what? Give a low-level Hitler type a badge or official credentials, a little bit of power, and they abuse it. The government should be broken down and rebuilt from the ground up. Tha... to be able to vote again. ...An actual threat to do you harm is illegal. However, an implied threat would be tricky to prosecute. If I said "I want to beat you up" is not the same as "I am going to beat you up... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |