![]() |
|
| *Home>>>Civil Rights Law |
Would this lawsuit have merit? |
A few years back I worked at a company called the Southern California Organ Procurement Center, which handled organ donation for the L.A. area. A few months after I started they changed their name to "OneLegacy" with the idea that "we all have one life, in which to give one gift, and leave one legacy". Being a lifelong believer in reincarnation, I found this whole one-one-one deal a little offensive. I shared my feelings with senior management and asked them to change the name but they refused. Eventually I had a breakdown over the issue and was terminated for not showing up. So my question is, given the significant mental stress I incurred over the issue and the morality of earning a living at a place that insulted my most cherished spiritual beliefs, would there be any kind of a merit for a wrongful termination, civil rights violent, mental anguish, etc? While I genuinely appreciate the opinions, I am really looking for an answer from a legal expert. According to U.S. law, State of California, Los Angeles County, does this constitute a hostile workplace, mental anguish, or a wrongful termination? No, I doubt it. You didn't have to stay with that company. You only had a problem with the name, not what they do. You could have found another job and you didn't show up for work, which led to your terminatioin. I doubt you have a case. i woulda fired you just for being a whiner. the world's unfair, i woulda thought you'd realized that by now (being an adult and all) so suck it up and deal with it. Nope, no merit here. Difference of opinion and you no longer fit the company model. You do that ,and everybody will be suing over names of local businesses , all because it offends them ... and even if there is a such thing as reincarnation you still only have one life ( at a time )) why do you think this country is getting so candy *ssed today , because they get their feelings hurt because everything is not their way ...you can waist your money ,and file BUT ..I doubt you will win , because as you stated "with the idea " you have to have solid evidence physical proof that this is the meaning of the company name ,and it was meant to offend you ,and everyone else that shares in your beliefs ...not gonna happen ..... technicaly there is no lawsuit there, the name was not a violation of any religion, nor was it discriminatory in any way, it may have been offensive against your personal believes, but not to the point where it would be seen as justifiable grounds for discrimination. as far as the wrongful termination, they terminated your employment for attendance reasons, if you had shown up for work and they had fired you for your beliefs then, and only then, would it justify a lawsuit. I am sorry, but best to just move on and keep personal beliefs and ethics seperate from work. If everyone could start a lawsuit against their employer because they do not agree with the way the business is ran, nammed, whatever, then we would have no banks, or law firms to file the suits! You were fired for nonperformance of your job, not subjected to any type of illegal discrimination from the facts that you have presented. Furthermore, you stated this happened "a few years back", so your claim might be barred by the applicable statute of limitation. |
| Tags |
| Collections Law Consumer Law Construction Law Constitutional Law Computer Law Child Custody Civil Rights Law Business Law Bankruptcy Law Banking Law Aviation Law Appeals and Writs |
| Related information |
The problem lies not in the solution to equality, because equality is not a desirable outcome of government policy. The carrot we should chase is liberty, not equality. XXXXXXX, my father was... "Not only is there almost no media coverage of the Black violent hate crimes against Whites, but in high profile cases when Blacks are prosecuted for heinous crimes against innocent Whites, th... Exactly what do White Americans have to do with "British, to South Africa, India?" The United States is a constitutional democracy meaning that our form of government will act to prote... 1. Disabled Persons 2. Persons involved in Federally funded programs 3. Employees of companies engaged in contracting to the federal government. 4. Persons who may have been discriminated ... The above answers and the discussion I have seen on the news outlets all fail to mention an important fact: she was not mentioned by name. I'm not saying that's a complete defense, but I&... Nothing. Your manager still has the right to fire you, just not because of this document. ...It's an awesome organization that is trying to keep a small minority in this country from eradicating something that this country was built upon...God. ...I think Martin Luther King would be spinning in his grave if he knew who is out here fighting for civil rights these days. Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson are setting the civil rights movement BACK... |
Categories--Copyright/IP Policy--Contact Webmaster |