Question on human rights and adoption?

Is a couple's right to have a biological child more important than an orphan's right to having a home and a guardian?

Is a couple's right to decide whether they are prepared to have a child more important than a child's right to a competent guardian?

Isn't the point when freedom interferes with a person's rights (in this case the child's rights) the point when the government should limit freedom in order to protect rights?

In my opinion, in the case of a child needing adoptive parents is a priority, they are already a person with real needs and a loving stable home is one of those needs.

The rights to a biological child is not as important in my opinion and those rights are removed from many parents when children are taken into care, due to some kind of abuse.

Infertility also means that a person cant have a biological child and although this may cause them emotional distress, you can foster or adopt or have fertility treatment.

Sadly, i don't think so. A child in need of a family does not have rights over my own desires to continue my family blood line.
Children who are trapped in the system are all sad cases, but what is your answer? Start forcing people who desire children to take these children? All you're doing is setting these children up to be placed in a household where they're really not wanted.
The people to blame for this sad situation are not people who want to be responsible , and have "their" children and raise them. The people to blame are these young girls who are having babies when they are unprepared to care for them. Sadly a movie like "Juno" (a pro life picture) sends out this message that it's better to have the baby then have it aborted because there is always this nice rich couple in the suburbs willing to adopt it. That's just not the case.
One last thing, in a nation where civil rights and freedom exist, nobodies rights supersedes anybodies, (that includes children) because if they did then, they your stripping the people of their most prided freedom - "Choice"

P.S. -Children also have the right to not be abused, a parents rights does not supersede that, and that's why those children are removed from those homes, for protection by our government.

Have you tried to adopt? The state I live in trust me the child looking to be adopted has rights you wouldn't even think of for your own child.

A couple have the right to have their own child. As far as a competent guardian the parents of the "orphan" took that right away. Giving that child to a couple who want their own child instead of someone who wants to adopt the child takes the orphan's right away to a loving family. So WHAT ARE YOU THINKING?

We tried to adopt. A found a beautiful little family of four ages 2-11 who needed a home. I wanted to adopt them because they were siblings and I was afraid they would be split up. We started taking the adoption classes. I had already had one miscarriage and was pretty sure I couldn't get pregnant. During the weeks of the class I found out I was pregnant. We were kicked out of the class. We could not adopt or think about adopting for a year after a major life event- any births, divorce, separation, marriage, deaths of anyone in the family up to and including your grandparents.

If you really want to do something change the adoption rules. I wanted to adopt before I had my own children so my children wouldn't know the other kids were adopted until we felt like telling them. The other kids I wanted to adopt I made sure they were old enough to know they had parents but we chose to be their mom and dad.

For me,it is important to take care of the orphans,but the higher priority is to have our own blood line,and take care of him. theres a lot of diffrnt btween others child and our own child.